<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computational justification for the use of meta descriptions and keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianmcquay.com/computational-justification-for-the-use-of-meta-descriptions-and-keywords/103/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianmcquay.com/computational-justification-for-the-use-of-meta-descriptions-and-keywords/103</link>
	<description>My Ruby on Rails experience, web development tips including SEO, and contributions to open source projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.brianmcquay.com/computational-justification-for-the-use-of-meta-descriptions-and-keywords/103/comment-page-1#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcquay.com/computational-justification-for-the-use-of-meta-descriptions-and-keywords/103#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I slept on this idea and now its not making much sense to me. A better way to skip processing pages would probably be to hash the page and compare the current hash with the previous hash for the page. Its a quick way to see if something has changed on the page.

If the hashes are different then they&#039;d parse the entire page to see what&#039;s changed. I&#039;m trying to justify my original post in my head but I can&#039;t think of a reason now that meta tags would help save computations for search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I slept on this idea and now its not making much sense to me. A better way to skip processing pages would probably be to hash the page and compare the current hash with the previous hash for the page. Its a quick way to see if something has changed on the page.</p>
<p>If the hashes are different then they&#8217;d parse the entire page to see what&#8217;s changed. I&#8217;m trying to justify my original post in my head but I can&#8217;t think of a reason now that meta tags would help save computations for search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

